Fri, 04 Jan 2013 20:12:31 +0000 Merge with stable
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Fri, 04 Jan 2013 20:12:31 +0000] rev 1181
Merge with stable
Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:19:52 +0100 localrepo: filter unknown nodes from the phasecache on destroyed stable
Idan Kamara <idankk86@gmail.com> [Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:19:52 +0100] rev 1180
localrepo: filter unknown nodes from the phasecache on destroyed When commit is followed by strip (qrefresh), phasecache contains nodes that were removed from the changelog. Since phasecache is filecached with .hg/store/phaseroots which doesn't change as a result of stripping, we have to filter it manually. If we don't write it immediately, the next time it is read from disk the nodes will be filtered again. That's what happened before, but there's no reason not to write it immediately. The change in test-keyword.t is caused by the above. [ original upstream message ]
Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:35:54 +0000 Merge with stable
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:35:54 +0000] rev 1179
Merge with stable
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:02:40 +0100 strip: do not update branchcache during strip (issue3745) stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:02:40 +0100] rev 1178
strip: do not update branchcache during strip (issue3745) At this moment, the cache is invalid, and will be thrown away. Later the strip function will call the `localrepo.destroyed` method that will update the branchmap cache. [ original upstream message ]
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 02:49:59 +0100 branchmap: move validity logic in the object itself stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 24 Dec 2012 02:49:59 +0100] rev 1177
branchmap: move validity logic in the object itself In several place, We check if a branchcache is still valid regarding the current state of the repository. This changeset puts this logic in a method of the object that can be reused when necessary. A branch map is considered valid whenever it is up to date or a strict subset of the repository state. The change will help making branchcache aware of filtered revision. The change in keyword is expected. the branch cache is actually invalid after the amend. The previous check did not detected it. [ original upstream message ]
Fri, 21 Dec 2012 15:21:55 +0000 Merge with stable
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Fri, 21 Dec 2012 15:21:55 +0000] rev 1176
Merge with stable
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:17:18 -0800 run-tests: fix whitespace nonsense stable
Bryan O'Sullivan <bos@serpentine.com> [Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:17:18 -0800] rev 1175
run-tests: fix whitespace nonsense [ original upstream message ]
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:52:58 -0800 run-tests: on windows, put correct python at front of PATH stable
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:52:58 -0800] rev 1174
run-tests: on windows, put correct python at front of PATH The older approach of trying to copy the python executable into the test directory was doomed to fail. There remains one weakness with this approach: if you've run "make local", tests may pick up the wrong extension DLLs from inside the source tree. I don't know why this happens. A reasonable workaround for now is to test either using --local or with a working directory that does not contain built DLLs. [ original upstream message ]
Sun, 09 Dec 2012 23:33:16 +0100 tests: kill daemons early, making breaking at "Accept" prompt safe stable
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Sun, 09 Dec 2012 23:33:16 +0100] rev 1173
tests: kill daemons early, making breaking at "Accept" prompt safe [ original upstream message ]
Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:38:42 -0800 run-tests: fix exename on Windows stable
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:38:42 -0800] rev 1172
run-tests: fix exename on Windows [ original upstream message ]
Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:13:23 -0800 run-tests: support running tests in parallel on windows stable
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:13:23 -0800] rev 1171
run-tests: support running tests in parallel on windows Previously, we used os.spawnvp, which doesn't exist on Windows, and isn't needed anyway (the command line begins with an absolute path). We also need a slightly more convoluted way to wait for processes without specifying an order on Windows, as it lacks os.wait. [ original upstream message ]
Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:14:55 -0800 run-tests: use correct python safely under --jobs stable
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:14:55 -0800] rev 1170
run-tests: use correct python safely under --jobs [ original upstream message ]
Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:09:02 -0800 run-tests: check for the correct python when starting stable
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:09:02 -0800] rev 1169
run-tests: check for the correct python when starting [ original upstream message ]
Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:07:42 -0800 run-tests: use correct python when run with --local stable
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:07:42 -0800] rev 1168
run-tests: use correct python when run with --local [ original upstream message ]
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:59:39 +0000 Merge with stable
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:59:39 +0000] rev 1167
Merge with stable
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -15 +15 +100 tip