test: display used python hash seed We keep using a random seed for each run, but we "compute" it ourself to be able to reproduce a failed test run. [ original upstream message ]

Merge with stable

run-tests: do not fail on empty tsttest file Initialize n for not failing on empty tsttest files. [ original upstream message ]

Merge with stable

run-tests.py: inherit PYTHONHASHSEED from environment if set This makes it possible to fix the seed by using for instance PYTHONHASHSEED=7 ./run-tests.py ... This can be very convenient when trying to debug problems that are influenced by hash values. Try different seed values until you find one that triggers the bad behaviour and then keep that while debugging. The value 0 will restore default Python behavior and disable randomization. [ original upstream message ]

Merge with stable

documentation: update to new filter names Changeset f3b21beb9802 change filter names but forgot some documentation updates. [ original upstream description ]

Merge with stable

run-tests.py: don't let hg run interactively in debug mode In normal test mode stdin is closed and hg is thus not interactive. In --debug mode stdin is inherited from the running console and to the tests, and hg could thus wait in prompts when running on Windows. See http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2013-January/047548.html . Instead set ui.interactive=False to make Mercurial non-interactive. Other commands might still work differently in the --debug environment. This should solve the problem with hg waiting for input but still make it possible to add --debugger to hg in a test and run run-tests.py with --debug. [ original upstream message ]

run-tests.py: backout "don't use console for stdin when running in debug mode" f5842787a958 caused that some kind of interactive debugging no longer was possible - such as running hg with --debugger in a test run with run-tests.py --debug . [ original upstream message ]

Merge with stable

get-with-headers: add a --headeronly switch In some case we do not care about the actual rendering. [ original upstream message ]

tests: make test-hgweb.t output stable Instability introduced in combination of a4d7fd7ad1f7 and e389a25e7e60. [ original upstream message ]

serve: don't send any content headers with 304 responses Fixes HTTP protocol violation introduced in cf5c76017e11. 'hg serve' would show a stacktrace when loading pages that not had been modified. There was test coverage for this, but the wrong response headers wasn't shown and thus not detected. [ original upstream message ]

destroyed: drop complex branchcache rebuilt logic The strip code used a trick to lower the cost of branchcache update after a strip. However is less necessary since we have branchcache collaboration. Invalid branchcache are likely to be cheaply rebuilt again a near subset of the repo. Moreover, this trick would need update to be relevant in the now filtered repository world. It currently update the unfiltered branchcache that few people cares about. Make it smarter on that aspect would need complexes update of the calling logic So this mechanism is: - Arguably needed, - Currently irrelevant, - Hard to update and I'm dropping it. We now update the branchcache in all case by courtesy of the read only reader. This changeset have a few expected impact on the testsuite are different cache are updated. [ original upstream message ]

branchmap: update cache of 'unserved' filter on new changesets The `commitctx` and `addchangegroup` methods of repo upgrade branchcache after completion. This behavior aims to keep the branchcache in sync for read only process as hgweb. See ee317dbfb9d0 for details. Since changelog filtering is used, those calls only update the cache for unfiltered repo. One of no interest for typical read only process like hgweb. Note: By chance in basic case, `repo.unfiltered() == repo.filtered('unserved')` This changesets have the "unserved" cache updated instead. I think this is the only cache that matter for hgweb. We could imagine updating all possible branchcaches instead but: - I'm not sure it would have any benefit impact. It may even increase the odd of all cache being invalidated. - This is more complicated change. So I'm going for updating a single cache only which is already better that updating a cache nobody cares about. This changeset have a few expected impact on the testsuite are different cache are updated. [ original upstream message ]