Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:27:53 +0100 run-tests: report a test as warned when only missing globs stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:27:53 +0100] rev 1339
run-tests: report a test as warned when only missing globs On windows, some test reported as failed will now be reported as "warned". [ original upstream message ]
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:26:13 +0100 run-tests: add possibility for test-runners to report a "warned" test result stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:26:13 +0100] rev 1338
run-tests: add possibility for test-runners to report a "warned" test result A test result is recognized as "warned" when the test runner returns the exit code False. (False is similar to 0, which is reporting a command has run sucessfully.) The only difference in display is that the failure message while running writes "Warning:" instead of "ERROR:". The diff output is the same as when the test fails. Runing "run-tests.py -i" asks to accept the changed result also for tests reported as "warned". When running tests, a "warned" test would look like this: .. --- xxxx\tests\test-something.t +++ xxxx\tests\test-something.t.err @@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ $ echo anything $ hg commit -S -m whatever committing subrepository s - committing subrepository s/sbs + committing subrepository s/sbs (glob) warning: something happened committing subrepository t $ echo something Warning: xxxx\tests\test-sOMETHING.t output changed ~.s...s...s.. Reporting a test result as "warned" will be used in following patches. [ original upstream message ]
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:17:39 +0100 run-tests: separate exit code when no failed tests but warned ones stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:17:39 +0100] rev 1337
run-tests: separate exit code when no failed tests but warned ones This can be used by buildbot to set the result "warnings" instead of "failed". [ original upstream message ]
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:14:54 +0100 run-tests: introduce 'warned' as test result stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:14:54 +0100] rev 1336
run-tests: introduce 'warned' as test result While running, a test resulting in 'warned' is shown as '~'. Test results with state warned are listed between the skipped and the failed tests. Example: Skipped test-revert-flags.t: missing feature: executable bit Skipped test-inotify-lookup.t: missing feature: inotify extension support Warned test-something.t: output changed Failed test-largefiles.t: output changed Failed test-subrepo.t: output changed # Ran 11 tests, 2 skipped, 1 warned, 2 failed. The test result "warned" will be used in later patches. [ original upstream message ]
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:02:06 +0100 run-tests: handle sys.exit in main function stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:02:06 +0100] rev 1335
run-tests: handle sys.exit in main function [ original upstream message ]
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:29:28 +0100 run-tests: remove unnecessary variable initialisation stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:29:28 +0100] rev 1334
run-tests: remove unnecessary variable initialisation ret is always set before it is used, so remove ret = 0 [ original upstream message ]
Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:52:13 +0100 Merge with stable
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:52:13 +0100] rev 1333
Merge with stable
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:09:18 +0100 tests: killdaemons.py for windows distinguishes access violation and terminated stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:09:18 +0100] rev 1332
tests: killdaemons.py for windows distinguishes access violation and terminated To distinguish between access violaition (process belonging to another user) and a terminated process, PROCESS_QUERY_INFORMATION must be enabled. But TerminateProcess still raises error 5 in both cases. Therefore check before if the process has already terminated. [ original upstream message ]
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:38:59 +0100 tests: killdaemons.py for checks reason when getting no process handle stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:38:59 +0100] rev 1331
tests: killdaemons.py for checks reason when getting no process handle [ original upstream message ]
Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:13:20 +0100 tests: killdaemons.py for windows waits for killed process to terminate stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:13:20 +0100] rev 1330
tests: killdaemons.py for windows waits for killed process to terminate After kill, wait for the process to terminate. When it does not in time, write a debug message similar as in other os. But no 2nd forceful attempt is done. [ original upstream message ]
Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:13:08 +0100 tests: kill for windows in killdaemons.py checks return values stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:13:08 +0100] rev 1329
tests: kill for windows in killdaemons.py checks return values The return values of the windll calls are checked and when an error is indicated, it is raised. The handle is still closed properly. [ original upstream message ]
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:50:56 +0100 Merge with stable
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:50:56 +0100] rev 1328
Merge with stable
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:15:07 +0100 run-tests: fix typo and print out failing line stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:15:07 +0100] rev 1327
run-tests: fix typo and print out failing line Instead of stripping the newline and printing the line, only the newline was printed. The output on buildbot will make more sense now. [ original upstream message ]
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:08:42 +0100 Merge with stable
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:08:42 +0100] rev 1326
Merge with stable
Wed, 05 Feb 2014 01:37:37 +0100 tests: ignore http tests that are known wontfix failures on python 2.4 stable
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Wed, 05 Feb 2014 01:37:37 +0100] rev 1325
tests: ignore http tests that are known wontfix failures on python 2.4 As mentioned on http://bz.selenic.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2739#c17 , b3083042bdda left test-http.t failing on Python < 2.4.3. That has not been noticed because most 2.4 testing has been done with a patched 2.4.2. This makes sure that the tests only are run for Python >= 2.4.3. That makes it possible to verify that everything else works with Python 2.4. [ original upstream message ]
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -15 +15 tip