Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:48:08 +0200 extensions: improve the consistency of synopses stable
C?dric Duval <cedricduval@free.fr> [Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:48:08 +0200] rev 584
extensions: improve the consistency of synopses Trying as much as possible to consistently: - use a present tense predicate followed by a direct object - verb referring directly to the functionality provided (ie. not "add command that does this" but simple "do that") - keep simple and to the point, leaving details for the long help (width is tight, possibly even more so for translations) Thanks to timeless, Martin Geisler, Rafael Villar Burke, Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen and others for the helpful suggestions. [ original upstream message ]
Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:17:37 +0100 Merge with stable
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:17:37 +0100] rev 583
Merge with stable
Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:57:13 +0200 help: remove per-extension paragraph on how to enable it stable
C?dric Duval <cedricduval@free.fr> [Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:57:13 +0200] rev 582
help: remove per-extension paragraph on how to enable it The central place to find this information is the "extensions" help topic. [ original upstream message ]
Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:45:39 +0100 (0.9.2compat) concise help title 0.9.2compat
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:45:39 +0100] rev 581
(0.9.2compat) concise help title
Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:43:19 +0100 (stable) merge stable
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:43:19 +0100] rev 580
(stable) merge
Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:21:26 +0100 Concise help title
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:21:26 +0100] rev 579
Concise help title
Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:10:15 +0100 Merge with stable
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:10:15 +0100] rev 578
Merge with stable
Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:03:26 +0200 Add patch.eol to ignore EOLs when patching (issue1019) stable
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:03:26 +0200] rev 577
Add patch.eol to ignore EOLs when patching (issue1019) The intent is to fix many issues involving patching when win32ext is enabled. With win32ext, the working directory and repository files EOLs are not the same which means that patches made on a non-win32ext host do not apply cleanly because of EOLs discrepancies. A theorically correct approach would be transform either the patched file or the patch content with the encoding/decoding filters used by win32ext. This solution is tricky to implement and invasive, instead we prefer to address the win32ext case, by offering a way to ignore input EOLs when patching and rewriting them when saving the patched result. [ original upstream message ]
Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:42:39 +0200 Merge with stable
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:42:39 +0200] rev 576
Merge with stable
Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:42:23 +0200 (0.9.2compat) update doc strings and help 0.9.2compat
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:42:23 +0200] rev 575
(0.9.2compat) update doc strings and help
Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:32:14 +0200 (0.9.2compat) improve English; from stable 0.9.2compat
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:32:14 +0200] rev 574
(0.9.2compat) improve English; from stable
Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:25:34 -0400 keyword: improve English stable
timeless <timeless@gmail.com> [Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:25:34 -0400] rev 573
keyword: improve English [ original upstream message ]
Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:34:01 +0200 Merge with stable
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:34:01 +0200] rev 572
Merge with stable
Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:14:44 -0500 merge: allow merging going backwards stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:14:44 -0500] rev 571
merge: allow merging going backwards New behavior is generally superior and more correct, except possibly with regards to missing files. hg up . is now effectively a no-op, which is probably the desired behavior for people expecting to move to tip, but may surprise people who were expecting deleted files to reappear. case 1: update to . a-w -> a-w classic: ancestor a missing recreated right? rmed recreated WRONG added forgotten WRONG changed preserved RIGHT conflicted can't happen backward merge: ancestor a (NO EFFECT) missing missing wrong? rm'ed rm'ed RIGHT added preserved RIGHT changed preserved RIGHT conflicted can't happen case 2: update to ancestor of . a-b-w -> b-w \ a classic: ancestor a missing recreated right? rmed recreated wrong? added forgotten wrong? changed preserved RIGHT conflicted preserved wrong? backwards merge: ancestor b missing missing or conflict right? rm'ed missing or conflict right? changed preserved RIGHT conflicted merge RIGHT added preserved right? [ original upstream message ]
Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:25:53 +0200 (stable) merge stable
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:25:53 +0200] rev 570
(stable) merge
(0) -300 -100 -15 +15 +100 +300 tip