Wed, 05 Feb 2014 01:37:37 +0100 tests: ignore http tests that are known wontfix failures on python 2.4 stable
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Wed, 05 Feb 2014 01:37:37 +0100] rev 1325
tests: ignore http tests that are known wontfix failures on python 2.4 As mentioned on http://bz.selenic.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2739#c17 , b3083042bdda left test-http.t failing on Python < 2.4.3. That has not been noticed because most 2.4 testing has been done with a patched 2.4.2. This makes sure that the tests only are run for Python >= 2.4.3. That makes it possible to verify that everything else works with Python 2.4. [ original upstream message ]
Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:22:20 +0100 Merge with stable
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:22:20 +0100] rev 1324
Merge with stable
Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:29:54 +0100 tests: 'hghave tic' also requires curses support in Python stable
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:29:54 +0100] rev 1323
tests: 'hghave tic' also requires curses support in Python test-status-color.t would fail when using a Python without curses. [ original upstream message ]
Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:32:21 +0000 Merge with stable
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:32:21 +0000] rev 1322
Merge with stable
Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:08:57 +0100 run-tests: print more information on unnecessary glob matching stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:08:57 +0100] rev 1321
run-tests: print more information on unnecessary glob matching Extend the message with the test name and the approximate line number. (The line number is the one of the command producing the output.) Finding the line to fix is easier now. old message: ...... Info, unnecessary glob: at a/b/c (glob) .. new message: ...... Info, unnecessary glob in test-example.t (after line 9): at a/b/c (glob) .. The test result is still pass as before. [ original upstream message ]
Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:08:29 +0100 run-tests: suggest to append glob when only path sep does not match stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:08:29 +0100] rev 1320
run-tests: suggest to append glob when only path sep does not match When the line does not match because of \ instead of / (on windows), append (glob) in the expected output. This allows to rename test-bla.t.err to test-bla.t for getting a correct output. This worked for other failures like missing (esc), but not here. Output example (only +- lines of diff): Before: - path/with/local/sep + path\\with\\local/sep Now: - path/with/local/sep + path/with/local/sep (glob) [ original upstream message ]
Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:06:49 +0100 run-tests: test each line matching function on its own stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:06:49 +0100] rev 1319
run-tests: test each line matching function on its own This has several advantages. * Each match function can return some information to the caller runone (used in the next patch). * It is not checked that the line ends in " (glob)" when rematch() returns false. * And it looks more readable. [ original upstream message ]
Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:26:54 +0100 run-tests: set the thread name to the test name for info on error stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:26:54 +0100] rev 1318
run-tests: set the thread name to the test name for info on error This does not happen when running normal. But when fiddling around with the test infrastructure, this helps a lot. Old traceback messge Exception in thread Thread-7: Traceback (most recent call last): ... new traceback message Exception in thread test-something.t: Traceback (most recent call last): ... [ original upstream message ]
Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:55:35 +0100 run-tests: report tests as failed when run-test raises an error stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:55:35 +0100] rev 1317
run-tests: report tests as failed when run-test raises an error Before no message was returned to the main thread. No result was registered and no new thread was started. This does not happen when running normal. But when fiddling around with the test infrastructure, this helps a lot. [ original upstream message ]
Tue, 07 Jan 2014 22:29:39 +0100 cleanup: Remove the only ever used skip-check-code pragma stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Tue, 07 Jan 2014 22:29:39 +0100] rev 1316
cleanup: Remove the only ever used skip-check-code pragma Use the work-around suggested by the rule instead [ original upstream message ]
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 tip