Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:32:04 +0100] rev 990
Merge with stable
Idan Kamara <idankk86@gmail.com> [Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:54:37 +0200] rev 989
run-tests: end doctest block when seeing a non-command
[ original upstream message ]
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:48:29 +0100] rev 988
Merge with stable
Idan Kamara <idankk86@gmail.com> [Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:01:14 +0200] rev 987
tests: add support for inline doctests in test files
This adds doctest like syntax to .t files, that can be interleaved with regular
shell code:
$ echo -n a > file
>>> print open('file').read()
a
>>> open('file', 'a').write('b')
$ cat file
ab
The syntax is exactly the same as regular doctests, so multiline statements
look like this:
>>> for i in range(3):
... print i
0
1
2
Each block has its own context, i.e.:
>>> x = 0
>>> print x
0
$ echo 'foo'
foo
>>> print x
will result in a NameError.
Errors are displayed in standard doctest format:
>>> print 'foo'
bar
--- /home/idan/dev/hg/default/tests/test-test.t
+++ /home/idan/dev/hg/default/tests/test-test.t.err
@@ -2,3 +2,16 @@
> >>> print 'foo'
> bar
> EOF
+ **********************************************************************
+ File "/tmp/tmps8X_0ohg-tst", line 1, in tmps8X_0ohg-tst
+ Failed example:
+ print 'foo'
+ Expected:
+ bar
+ Got:
+ foo
+ **********************************************************************
+ 1 items had failures:
+ 1 of 1 in tmps8X_0ohg-tst
+ ***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
+ [1]
As for the implementation, it's quite simple: when the test runner sees a line
starting with '>>>' it converts it, and all subsequent lines until the next
line that begins with '$' to a 'python -m heredoctest <<EOF' call with the
proper heredoc to follow. So if we have this test file:
>>> for c in 'abcd':
... print c
a
b
c
d
$ echo foo
foo
It gets converted to:
$ python -m heredoctest <<EOF
> >>> for c in 'abcd':
> ... print c
> a
> b
> c
> d
> EOF
$ echo foo
foo
And then processed like every other test file by converting it to a sh script.
[ original upstream message ]
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Sat, 08 Oct 2011 00:24:35 +0100] rev 986
Merge with stable
Greg Ward <greg@gerg.ca> [Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:34:28 -0400] rev 985
import: wrap a transaction around the whole command
Now 'rollback' after 'import' is less surprising: it rolls back all of
the imported changesets, not just the last one. As an extra added
benefit, you don't need 'rollback -f' after 'import --bypass', which
was an undesired side effect of fixing issue2998 (59e8bc22506e)..
Note that this is a different take on issue963, which complained that
rollback after importing multiple patches returned the working dir
parent to the starting point, not to the second-last patch applied.
Since we now rollback the entire import, returning the working dir to
the starting point is entirely logical. So this change also undoes
a732eebf1958, the fix to issue963, and updates its tests accordingly.
Bottom line: rollback after import was weird before issue963,
understandable since the fix for issue963, and even better now.
[ original upstream message ]