Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:09:26 +0100 destroyed: drop complex branchcache rebuilt logic stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:09:26 +0100] rev 1198
destroyed: drop complex branchcache rebuilt logic The strip code used a trick to lower the cost of branchcache update after a strip. However is less necessary since we have branchcache collaboration. Invalid branchcache are likely to be cheaply rebuilt again a near subset of the repo. Moreover, this trick would need update to be relevant in the now filtered repository world. It currently update the unfiltered branchcache that few people cares about. Make it smarter on that aspect would need complexes update of the calling logic So this mechanism is: - Arguably needed, - Currently irrelevant, - Hard to update and I'm dropping it. We now update the branchcache in all case by courtesy of the read only reader. This changeset have a few expected impact on the testsuite are different cache are updated. [ original upstream message ]
Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:08:08 +0100 branchmap: update cache of 'unserved' filter on new changesets stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:08:08 +0100] rev 1197
branchmap: update cache of 'unserved' filter on new changesets The `commitctx` and `addchangegroup` methods of repo upgrade branchcache after completion. This behavior aims to keep the branchcache in sync for read only process as hgweb. See ee317dbfb9d0 for details. Since changelog filtering is used, those calls only update the cache for unfiltered repo. One of no interest for typical read only process like hgweb. Note: By chance in basic case, `repo.unfiltered() == repo.filtered('unserved')` This changesets have the "unserved" cache updated instead. I think this is the only cache that matter for hgweb. We could imagine updating all possible branchcaches instead but: - I'm not sure it would have any benefit impact. It may even increase the odd of all cache being invalidated. - This is more complicated change. So I'm going for updating a single cache only which is already better that updating a cache nobody cares about. This changeset have a few expected impact on the testsuite are different cache are updated. [ original upstream message ]
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:30:10 +0100 tests: run with PYTHONHASHSEED=random stable
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:30:10 +0100] rev 1196
tests: run with PYTHONHASHSEED=random Python set and dict iteration order is in principle undefined but usually 'quite stable'. Setting PYTHONHASHSEED=random will make the iteration order more random in Python 2.6.8 and 2.7.3 and where it has been backported. This can thus help spot dependencies on undefined behaviour and prevent future problems. [ original upstream message ]
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -3 +3 +10 +30 +100 tip