Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Sat, 28 May 2011 15:16:55 +0100] rev 961
Merge with stable
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Sat, 28 May 2011 11:44:27 +0200] rev 960
run-tests: fix --blacklist (broken by 95715c2f90bf)
[ original upstream message ]
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Sat, 28 May 2011 03:19:16 +0100] rev 959
Merge with stable
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 21:50:10 +0200] rev 958
patch: use temporary files to handle intermediate copies
git patches may require copies to be handled out-of-order. For instance, take
the following sequence:
* modify a
* copy a into b
Here, we have to generate b from a before its modification. To do so,
applydiff() was scanning for copy metadata and performing the copies before
processing the other changes in-order. While smart and efficient, this approach
complicates things by handling file copies and file creations at different
places and times. While a new file must not exist before being patched a copied
file already exists before applying the first hunk.
Instead of copying the files at their final destination before patching, we
store them in a temporary file location and retrieve them when patching. The
filestore always stores file content in real files but nothing prevents adding
a cache layer. The filestore class was kept separate from fsbackend for at
least two reasons:
- This class is likely to be reused as a temporary result store for a future
repository patching call (entries just have to be extended to contain copy
sources).
- Delegating this role to backends might be more efficient in a repository
backend case: the source files are already available in the repository itself
and do not need to be copied again. It also means that third-parties backend
would have to implement two other methods. If we ever decide to merge the
filestore feature into backend, a minimalistic approach would be to compose
with filestore directly. Keep in mind this copy overhead only applies for
copy/rename sources, and may even be reduced to copy sources which have to
handled ahead of time.
[ original upstream message ]
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 21:50:09 +0200] rev 957
patch: refactor file creation/removal detection
The patcher has to know if a file is being created or removed to check if the
target already exists, or to actually unlink the file when a hunk emptying it
is applied. This was done by embedding the creation/removal information in the
first (and only) hunk attached to the file.
There are two problems with this approach:
- creation/removal is really a property of the file being patched and not its
hunk.
- for regular patches, file creation cannot be deduced at parsing time: there
are case where the *stripped* file paths must be compared. Modifying hunks
after their creation is clumsy and prevent further refactorings related to
copies handling.
Instead, we delegate this job to selectfile() which has all the relevant
information, and remove the hunk createfile() and rmfile() methods.
[ original upstream message ]
Idan Kamara <idankk86@gmail.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 17:46:48 +0300] rev 956
run-tests: fix --blacklist with jobs > 1
filter blacklisted tests before partitioning them
to the children.
maintains the 'Skipped...' output but not the 's'.
[ original upstream message ]
Idan Kamara <idankk86@gmail.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 17:46:47 +0300] rev 955
run-tests: slightly simplify blacklist check
[ original upstream message ]
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Thu, 19 May 2011 00:51:06 +0200] rev 954
Merge with stable
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Wed, 18 May 2011 23:48:13 +0200] rev 953
patch: set desired mode when patching, not in updatedir()
This patch and the following aim at merging _updatedir() actions into
_applydiff().
[ original upstream message ]
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Wed, 18 May 2011 23:30:45 +0200] rev 952
Merge with stable